Research approach

How we engineer for uncertainty

Large-scale engineering systems are committed to for decades, in conditions that cannot be forecast with confidence. Our method treats that uncertainty as a design variable, not an afterthought.

Seven principles run through everything we do, applied consistently across our research and project work, from lunar resource value-chains to transport and energy infrastructure. This page sets them out in full.

Seven principles

Every project we take on, from lunar in-situ resource utilisation to transport and energy infrastructure, applies the same underlying method — focused on decision quality under uncertainty.

  1. 01Frame the decision

    We begin by defining the decision itself: its objectives, the stakeholders it affects, and the criteria against which success will be judged, before any modelling work starts.

    OBJECTIVECANDIDATE DECISIONS
    One decision, stated before any modelling starts
  2. 02Model uncertainty explicitly

    Rather than relying on a single forecast, we represent the ranges and drivers that could plausibly shape long-horizon outcomes, and identify which uncertainties actually matter to the decision at hand.

    POINT FORECASTRANGE THAT MATTERS
    A range with drivers, not a single forecast
  3. 03Map the wider system

    Engineering decisions rarely stand alone. We connect technical architecture to operations, economics, and stakeholder interests, so a design choice is evaluated in its full context, not in isolation.

    DESIGN CHOICEOPERATIONS · ECONOMICS · STAKEHOLDERS
    The decision in its wider context
  4. 04Design for change over time

    We distinguish what should be fixed at the outset from what can be staged, deferred, or built with the capacity to adapt as conditions become clearer.

    GATE 1GATE 2GATE 3COMMITTEDHELD AS OPTIONS
    What is committed, and what is held as an option
  5. 05Explore the space of possibilities

    Using simulation ensembles and structured scenario analysis, we compare credible alternatives across many futures rather than optimising for one assumed outcome.

    ONE STARTING POINT · MANY FUTURES
    Many futures, compared
  6. 06Quantify the value of flexibility

    Where a design can adapt, we use real options analysis to determine whether that adaptability is worth its cost — turning flexibility from an intuition into a number decision-makers can act on.

    VALUE OFFLEXIBILITYFIXEDFLEXIBLE
    What adaptability is worth
  7. 07Balance risk and reward

    We bring stakeholders' differing priorities into a shared, transparent view of trade-offs, supporting recommendations and next steps that are defensible under scrutiny.

    RISKFRONTIER
    The frontier, and the trade-offs along it
01